In criminology, desistance is the process by which criminal offending declines and eventually stops for someone who was previously active in crime. A widely cited 2001 synthesis by John H. Laub and Robert J. Sampson distinguished desistance, the underlying causal process, from termination, the point at which offending actually ends, and identified good marriages, stable employment, transformation of identity and aging as recurring correlates across studies. Their life course perspective treats stopping crime as a gradual outcome of changing social bonds and turning points in adulthood rather than a single decision.
Facts
Connections
Associated With
Source Laub and Sampson 2001: Understanding Desistance from CrimeJohn H. Laub and Robert J. Sampson
Informed By
Source Laub and Sampson 2001: Understanding Desistance from CrimeJohn H. Laub and Robert J. Sampson
Source Laub and Sampson 2001: Understanding Desistance from CrimeJohn H. Laub and Robert J. Sampson
Sources
1. Laub and Sampson 2001: Understanding Desistance from Crime
John H. Laub and Robert J. Sampson, University of Chicago Press (Crime and Justice, vol. 28)Abstract
Termination is the point when criminal activity stops and desistance is the underlying causal process.
Title
Understanding Desistance from Crime
- Informed By: Robert J. Sampson, Author byline
- Informed By: John H. Laub, Author byline
View the Source Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.