Crime and Justice Atlas

How Justice Is Served
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Foundational Concept

Chain of Custody

Also Known As Chain of Evidence
Investigation and Evidence Concepts

The documented, unbroken record of who collected, handled, transferred and stored a piece of evidence from the moment it is recovered until it is presented in court, required to establish that evidence has not been altered or contaminated.

Facts
Domain
Forensic practice 1
FAQs

What happens if the chain of custody is broken?

If the prosecution cannot establish who had possession of an item of evidence at every point between its collection and its presentation in court, the chain is considered broken, and defense counsel may seek to have the resulting evidence excluded.
Connections

Exemplified By Cases

Source Wikipedia: O. J. Simpson murder case

Informed By

Locard's exchange principle, that every contact leaves a trace, is the reason chain of custody and contamination prevention matter for trace evidence.

Source EBSCO Research Starters: Locard's Exchange Principle
Sources
1. Saferstein, Criminalistics: An Introduction to Forensic Science
Richard Saferstein, Pearson
StatPearls: Chain of Custody
StatPearls Publishing / National Center for Biotechnology InformationIntroduction section
Quote, Introduction section
The continuity of possession of evidence is known as the chain of custody or chain of evidence.
View the Source
EBSCO Research Starters: Locard's Exchange Principle
EBSCO Information ServicesInformed By: Edmond Locard, paragraph 4
Quote, Informed By: Edmond Locard, paragraph 4
Because evidentiary use of exchanged materials depends on there being no acceptable alternative explanation for the materials being where they are, issues of chain of custody and prevention of contamination are extremely important.
View the Source
Wikipedia: O. J. Simpson murder case
Exemplified By Cases: O. J. Simpson Murder Case, evidence-collection discussion
Quote, Exemplified By Cases: O. J. Simpson Murder Case, evidence-collection discussion
Fung and Mazzola did admit to making several mistakes during evidence collection, which included not always changing gloves between handling evidence items.
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.