Landmark Cases
Lindbergh Kidnapping
Also Known As Crime of the Century
Citation Formats
General Reference
APA Style
BibTeX
The 1932 abduction and killing of the infant son of aviator Charles Lindbergh in New Jersey. Wood examiner Arthur Koehler matched wood from the kidnappers ladder to flooring in the home of Bruno Richard Hauptmann, who was convicted and executed in 1936. The case pioneered forensic wood analysis and led Congress to pass the Federal Kidnapping Act.
Facts
Case YearSourced to the subject's own account LocationSourced to the subject's own accountNew Jersey, United States 1 Investigative or Reform SignificanceSourced to the subject's own accountPioneered forensic wood analysis as trial evidence and led directly to the Federal Kidnapping Act, making kidnapping across state lines a federal crime. 1 Case StatusSourced to the subject's own accountClosed; convicted and executed (1936) 1 Cross-Tradition Connections
Investigated By
Led the state police investigation; distinct from Arthur Koehler, already linked for wood analysis.
Used In
Albert S. Osborn's comparison of the ransom notes with Hauptmann's handwriting was crucial evidence.
Sources
1. Wikipedia: Lindbergh Kidnapping
Lead section, opening paragraphQuote, Lead section, opening paragraph
Charles Augustus Lindbergh Jr. (born June 22, 1930), the 20-month-old son of Col. Charles Lindbergh and his wife, aviator and author Anne Morrow Lindbergh, was murdered after being abducted.
1. Wikipedia: Lindbergh Kidnapping
Introduction sectionQuote, Introduction section
The crime spurred the U.S. Congress to pass the Federal Kidnapping Act (commonly referred to as the 'Little Lindbergh Law' at the time of its passage), which made transporting a kidnapping victim across state lines a federal crime.
1. Wikipedia: Lindbergh Kidnapping
Wikipedia: Questioned Document Examination
Wikipedia: Norman Schwarzkopf Sr.
Investigated By: H. Norman Schwarzkopf Sr., Lindbergh kidnapping section, called to the sceneQuote, Investigated By: H. Norman Schwarzkopf Sr., Lindbergh kidnapping section, called to the scene
was among the officials called to the East Amwell residence of Charles Lindbergh, following the kidnapping of his 20-month-old son, Charlie
Frequently Asked Questions
Was Bruno Hauptmann truly guilty, or does doubt remain?
The question remains actively debated. A number of researchers have argued for Hauptmann's innocence, citing flawed crime-scene work and circumstantial evidence, though the historical consensus among most scholars still holds the conviction as sound.Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.