Crime and Justice Atlas

How Justice Is Served
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Offense

Receiving Stolen Property

Property Offenses Without Violence

Receiving stolen property, also codified in many jurisdictions as trafficking in or possession of stolen property, is the offense of knowingly acquiring, possessing, concealing, or disposing of property that was obtained through theft, robbery, burglary, or another property crime, committed by the person who takes it in after the original taking rather than by the original thief. The knowledge element is central to the offense: most statutes require the prosecution to prove the defendant knew or reasonably should have known the property was stolen, which in practice is frequently inferred from circumstances such as a price far below market value, a seller's evasiveness, or dealing in goods with removed or altered serial numbers. The offense is the legal foundation for prosecuting fencing, the organized purchase and resale of stolen goods, which criminologists study as a distinct market-based node in the property-crime economy that provides thieves the liquidity to convert stolen goods into cash and, in doing so, sustains the demand that drives theft and burglary rates. Receiving stolen property statutes are frequently graded by the value of the property involved, paralleling the value-based grading common to theft and larceny offenses, and many jurisdictions impose enhanced penalties on dealers, pawnbrokers, and other commercial actors who receive stolen goods as part of an ongoing business.

Facts
Classification Code
In the United States, receipt of stolen property is a federal crime under 18 U.S.C. Section 2315, defined as knowingly receiving, concealing, or disposing of stolen property worth at least $5,000 that also involves interstate commerce. 1
Typical Penalty
In England and Wales, handling stolen goods is triable either way, and a person convicted on indictment faces up to fourteen years imprisonment, or up to six months and a fine on summary conviction. 1
Elements of Offense
What distinguishes receiving stolen property from possession of stolen property is when the person became aware the property was stolen: knowing it was stolen at the time of receipt makes it receiving, while learning only afterward makes it possession. 1
Notable Example
In the Ohio case State v. Awad, a court held that the goods involved did not need to actually have been stolen, only represented as such, to support a conviction. 1
Jurisdiction Variation
In Scotland the offense is called reset and covers property taken by theft or robbery as well as property taken through breach of trust such as embezzlement, fraud, or willful imposition, a broader net than the England and Wales handling-stolen-goods offense. 1
Classification
Offense Grade
Minor or Summary Offense 1
Connections

Has Offense Grade

Entity-backed identity for the offense-grade enum value this offense already carries, resolved to a crime concept by an explicit value-to-entity map (phase 3 bucket conversion, docs\design_entity_backed_browse_buckets_20260928.md). The offense-grade fact itself stays on the offense unchanged.

Sources
1. Possession of stolen goods (Wikipedia)
Wikipedia
  • en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Possession_of_stolen_goods, lead paragraph
    Possession of stolen goods is a crime in which an individual has bought, been given, or acquired stolen goods.
  • United States section, first sentence
    In the United States, receipt of stolen property is a federal crime under 18 U.S.C. § 2315, and is defined as knowingly receiving, concealing, or disposing of stolen property with a value of at least $5,000 such that it also constitutes interstate commerce.
  • United States section, receiving vs possession distinction
    What distinguishes the offenses is when the person became aware that the property was stolen. If the person knew that the property was stolen at the time he received it, the crime is receiving stolen property.
  • United Kingdom section, Scotland subsection
    In Scotland, this crime is called reset. It includes property that was taken by theft or robbery as well as property taken by breaches of trust including embezzlement, fraud, and willful imposition.
  • United States section, Ohio State v. Awad reference
    In the Ohio case of State v. Awad, the goods did not need to actually be stolen, just represented as such.
  • United Kingdom section, England and Wales penalty paragraph
    A person guilty of handling stolen goods is liable, on conviction on indictment, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding fourteen years, or on summary conviction to imprisonment for a term not exceeding six months, or to a fine not exceeding the prescribed sum, or to both.
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.