The practice of breaking up a large financial transaction into multiple smaller transactions, each kept below the reporting threshold that would otherwise require a bank or other financial institution to file a currency transaction report with regulators, in order to avoid detection of the underlying funds. Sometimes called smurfing, it is prosecuted as a distinct offense from the money laundering it frequently facilitates, since the mere act of structuring transactions to evade reporting requirements is itself illegal even when the underlying funds are never proven to be criminal proceeds. It became a significant enforcement focus in the United States following the Bank Secrecy Act's reporting requirements, which set the threshold that structuring is specifically designed to evade.
Facts
Classification CodeUnited States: 31 U.S.C. section 5324, enacted by Congress in 1986, prohibits structuring a transaction to evade the currency transaction reporting requirements of the Bank Secrecy Act; a separate Form 8300 filing duty is required under Internal Revenue Code section 6050I. 1 Typical PenaltyUnder 31 U.S.C. section 5324, a violation may be punished by a fine or up to five years in prison, or both; sums deposited below the reporting threshold may also be seized after a warrant is issued based on a financial institution's suspicious activity report, with recovery proceedings for an innocent party potentially costing 20,000 dollars or more. 1 Elements of OffenseStructuring is the act of parceling what would otherwise be a large financial transaction into a series of smaller transactions to avoid scrutiny by regulators and law enforcement, typically executing each smaller transaction below a statutory reporting limit, commonly more than 10,000 dollars in cash under the United States Bank Secrecy Act, that would otherwise require a financial institution to file a currency transaction report. 1 Notable ExampleReports in October 2014 by The New York Times documenting arbitrary seizures under structuring law led the Internal Revenue Service to modify its practice, restricting investigations to those that closely align with the agency's mission and key priorities. 1 Classification
Offense GradeSerious or Indictable Offense 1 Connections
Has Offense Grade
Entity-backed identity for the offense-grade enum value this offense already carries, resolved to a crime concept by an explicit value-to-entity map (phase 3 bucket conversion, docs\design_entity_backed_browse_buckets_20260928.md). The offense-grade fact itself stays on the offense unchanged.
Sources
1. Structuring (Wikipedia)
WikipediaRegulations, United States, statute paragraph
In 1986, the U.S. Congress enacted section 5324 of Title 31 of the United States Code, which provides (in part):
Overview section, first sentence
Structuring is the act of parceling what would otherwise be a large financial transaction into a series of smaller transactions to avoid scrutiny by regulators and law enforcement.
Regulations, United States, penalty paragraph
Section 5324 further provides that a violation of this provision may be punished by a fine or up to five years in prison, or both.
Regulations, United States, IRS practice paragraph
Reports in October 2014 by The New York Times of arbitrary seizures resulted in modification of Internal Revenue Service (IRS) practice to focus on investigations that "closely align" with IRS "mission and key priorities".
View the Source Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.