Crime and Justice Atlas

How Justice Is Served
Open Questions

Does microscopic hair comparison meet a scientific reliability standard?

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Open Question

A joint FBI, Department of Justice and Innocence Project review found that FBI examiners had overstated the significance of microscopic hair comparison matches in the overwhelming majority of trial testimony and reports reviewed, in cases going back decades, including several that led to convictions later overturned by DNA evidence.

What would resolve this A published statistical error-rate study for microscopic hair comparison under blind proficiency testing, and a documented professional consensus on what conclusion language, if any, the method can support without DNA confirmation.
OpenForensic science standards and trace evidence analysisInnocence Project: FBI Testimony on Microscopic Hair Analysis Review
Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

In 2015 the FBI itself reported that Laboratory examiners had overstated the reliability of microscopic hair comparison testimony in the large majority of cases reviewed, the finding underlying this atlas open question on the technique.

Question On

Sources
Innocence Project: FBI Testimony on Microscopic Hair Analysis Review
Wikipedia: FBI Laboratory
Associated With: FBI Laboratory, 21st century controversies section
Quote, Associated With: FBI Laboratory, 21st century controversies section
In 2015 the FBI reported that their expert witnesses overstated the reliability of hair analysis in matching suspects 96 percent of the time
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.