Crime and Justice Atlas

How Justice Is Served
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Open Question

Does offender profiling outperform non-specialist judgment?

Open Question

Criminal profiling gained wide public visibility through cases such as the Jack the Ripper murders and the FBI Behavioral Science Unit's work, but controlled studies comparing trained profilers against detectives, psychologists and students with no profiling training have repeatedly failed to show that profilers predict offender characteristics more accurately than non-specialists.

What would resolve this Blind, controlled comparative studies, replicated across research groups, showing profilers achieve statistically significant accuracy above both chance and non-specialist baselines on real case data.
OpenForensic psychology and behavioral science methodologyOffender Profiling (Wikipedia)
Connections

Question On

Source Offender Profiling (Wikipedia)
Sources
Offender Profiling (Wikipedia)
  • Research section: Pinizzotto and Finkel 1990
    showed that trained criminal profilers did not do any better than non-profilers in producing an accurate profile
  • Research section: Kocsis and Irwin 2000
    A 2000 study also showed that profilers were not significantly better at creating a profile than any other participating groups.
  • Research section: Alison et al. 2003
    A 2003 study that asked two different groups of police to rate how accurately a profile matched a description of the apprehended offender found the profile was rated equally accurate in both cases, demonstrating the presence of the Barnum effect.
  • Research section: Snook et al. 2007-2008
    have prompted some researchers to label the practice as pseudoscientific
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.