Crime and Justice Atlas

How Justice Is Served
Landmark Cases

Francisca Rojas Case

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

A 1892 murder case in Necochea, Argentina, in which a bloody fingerprint left at the scene secured the first criminal conviction in the world based on fingerprint evidence, establishing fingerprints as superior to anthropometric measurement for criminal identification.

Facts
Case YearSourced to the subject's own account
1892 1
LocationSourced to the subject's own account
Necochea, Buenos Aires Province, Argentina 1
Investigative or Reform SignificanceSourced to the subject's own account
The first criminal conviction in the world secured through fingerprint evidence, leading Argentina to become the first nation to base its criminal records solely on fingerprint classification. 1
Case StatusSourced to the subject's own account
Closed; convicted 1
Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

Inspector Eduardo Alvarez, who lifted the fingerprint that solved the case, had been personally trained by Vucetich in his newly developed classification system.

Investigated By

Inspector Alvarez of the provincial Central Police, trained in Vucetich's fingerprint method, was sent to Necochea to assist the local police and recovered the bloody fingerprint that identified Rojas.

Used In

The first criminal conviction in the world secured by fingerprint evidence.

Sources
1. Wikipedia: Francisca Rojas
Short description
Quote, Short description
Argentine murderer; first person found guilty using fingerprints
View the Source
1. Wikipedia: Francisca Rojas
Used In: DactyloscopyView the Source
1. Wikipedia: Francisca Rojas
Investigated By: Buenos Aires Provincial Police, Investigation section
Quote, Investigated By: Buenos Aires Provincial Police, Investigation section
Police Inspector Alvarez, of the Central Police, was sent to Necochea to assist local police with the investigation.
View the Source
NLM Visible Proofs: Juan Vucetich
U.S. National Library of MedicineAssociated With: Juan Vucetich, main exhibit textView the Source
Frequently Asked Questions

Was this really the first fingerprint-based murder conviction in history?

It is widely credited as such in secondary literature on the history of forensic identification, though the claim rests substantially on a single well-documented account of the case rather than an exhaustive comparative survey, so it is best described as widely credited rather than definitively established.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.